Make observations or collect data from representations of laboratory setups or results, while attending to precision where appropriate.
Reading a thermometer: record to one estimated digit past the smallest division. A thermometer marked in 1 °C increments is read to ±0.1 °C. Read at eye level, with the bulb fully immersed and not touching the container wall.
Calorimetry technique:
Standard assumptions you may be asked to state: the calorimeter absorbs negligible energy, no energy is exchanged with the surroundings, and the dilute aqueous solution has the density (1.00 g/mL) and specific heat capacity (4.18 J·g⁻¹·°C⁻¹) of water.
Error direction: essentially every calorimetry error — no lid, slow mixing, delayed reading, a cold thermometer absorbing energy — reduces the measured ΔT and therefore underestimates the magnitude of ΔH.
A student measures ΔH for a neutralization and obtains −48 kJ/mol; the accepted value is −57.3 kJ/mol. Give two plausible experimental explanations and state why each lowers the magnitude.
1. Energy loss to the surroundings. If the calorimeter was not covered or was poorly insulated, some of the energy released escaped to the room instead of warming the solution. The measured ΔT is therefore smaller than the true value, so qsolution = mcΔT is too small and the magnitude of the calculated ΔH is too small.
2. Energy absorbed by the calorimeter and thermometer. The cups, stirrer, and thermometer all warm along with the solution, absorbing energy that is not counted in q = msolution × c × ΔT. Again the measured ΔT understates the energy released, and |ΔH| comes out low.
Also acceptable: delayed temperature reading, so the maximum was missed as the system cooled; or failure to stir, so the thermometer read a cooler region of the solution.
Note the pattern: nearly every calorimetry error reduces the observed temperature change, which is why student values for exothermic reactions are almost always low in magnitude.