Explain the relationship between very large or very small values of K and the relative concentrations of chemical species at equilibrium.
Some equilibrium reactions have very large K values and proceed essentially to completion; others have very small K values and barely proceed at all.
Because K is a ratio of products to reactants:
Practical consequences:
What K does not tell you:
Connection to thermodynamics: ΔG° = −RT ln K (topic 9.5). K > 1 corresponds to ΔG° < 0, and K < 1 to ΔG° > 0 — the same statement in two vocabularies.
Three reactions have K = 4.2 × 10⁻¹², K = 1.8, and K = 3.5 × 10¹⁵. For each, describe the composition at equilibrium and comment on whether the reaction is useful for producing the product.
K = 4.2 × 10⁻¹² (reactant-favored). The denominator vastly exceeds the numerator, so at equilibrium the mixture is essentially all reactants with only trace product. This reaction is not useful for making product directly — you would need to drive it by removing product continuously (Le Châtelier) or by coupling it to a favorable reaction (9.7).
K = 1.8 (comparable). Products and reactants are present in similar amounts. This is the situation where an ICE table is genuinely necessary and the "x is small" approximation will fail. Useful for making product, but the yield is limited and reaction conditions matter.
K = 3.5 × 10¹⁵ (product-favored). Essentially complete; only a negligible trace of reactant remains at equilibrium. Excellent for producing the product from a thermodynamic standpoint — though the reaction could still be far too slow to be practical, since K says nothing about rate.