4.1 Intro to Reactions

Evidence of Chemical Change

Predict physical or chemical, then run 12 bench trials and judge them against the four kinds of evidence. Look-alike cases show why bubbles and colour are never proof on their own.

Predict First12 Trials4 Kinds of EvidenceNew Substances?
Topic 4.1

Introduction for Reactions

Identify evidence of chemical and physical changes in matter.

A physical change occurs when a substance changes properties but not composition. Phase changes and the formation or separation of mixtures are the standard examples. Ice melting is still H₂O; dissolving sugar still leaves sugar molecules.

A chemical change occurs when substances are transformed into new substances, typically with different compositions. The CED lists four kinds of observable evidence:

  • Production of heat or light
  • Formation of a gas
  • Formation of a precipitate
  • Color change

Note the CED's careful wording: these provide possible evidence that a chemical change has occurred. None of them is proof on its own. Boiling water produces bubbles of gas; mixing hot and cold water changes temperature; dissolving a colored salt changes the color of the liquid. Every one of those is a physical change.

The decisive test is always the same question: are there new substances present that were not there before? If yes, the change is chemical.

Symbolic conventions. Reactants on the left, products on the right, an arrow between. Phase labels — (s), (l), (g), (aq) — are expected and often carry points.

Key points

  • Physical change: same substances, different form. Chemical change: new substances.
  • Heat/light, gas, precipitate, and color change are evidence, not proof.
  • Phase labels are part of a correct chemical equation.

Common mistakes

  • Bubbles do not prove a chemical change. Boiling produces gas without any new substance.
  • Color change can be physical. Diluting a colored solution changes its color without changing composition.
  • Dissolving is ambiguous — see 4.4, where the CED treats it explicitly as a case where reasonable arguments exist both ways.

Worked example

Classify each as a physical or chemical change and justify: (a) dry ice sublimes, (b) iron rusts, (c) a magnesium ribbon burns with a bright white light, (d) a purple KMnO₄ solution is diluted and appears pink.

(a) Physical. Solid CO₂ becomes gaseous CO₂. Only intermolecular interactions are overcome; the molecules themselves are unchanged.

(b) Chemical. Iron and oxygen form a new substance, iron(III) oxide, with a different composition and different properties.

(c) Chemical. The production of light and heat accompanies formation of a new substance, MgO, a white powder chemically distinct from the metal.

(d) Physical. The color changed, but no new substance formed — the same MnO₄⁻ ions are simply present at a lower concentration. This is exactly why color change is only "possible evidence".

Full notes for topic 4.1 →