Explain the relationship between the type of bonding and the properties of the elements participating in the bond.
Electronegativity is an atom's pull on the electrons in a bond. For the representative elements it increases left to right across a period and decreases down a group — for exactly the reasons from Unit 1: rising effective nuclear charge across, added shells and shielding down.
The difference in electronegativity between two bonded atoms tells you how the electrons are distributed:
The single most important idea here is EK 2.1.A.3(iii): all polar bonds have some ionic character, and the difference between ionic and covalent bonding is not a sharp boundary but a continuum. There is no magic ΔEN value that flips a bond from covalent to ionic.
That said, EK 2.1.A.4 gives practical guidance: electronegativity difference is not the only factor. Generally, metal + nonmetal → ionic, and nonmetal + nonmetal → covalent. And the definitive test is not a number at all — it is examining the properties of the compound (melting point, conductivity, brittleness).
Metallic bonding is the third type: in a metallic solid the valence electrons are delocalized, belonging to the whole lattice rather than to any individual atom.
Rank the bonds C–F, C–O, C–C, and C–H from most to least polar, and explain your ranking.
Electronegativity values: F (4.0) > O (3.5) > C (2.5) ≈ H (2.1).
C–F (ΔEN 1.5) > C–O (ΔEN 1.0) > C–H (ΔEN 0.4) > C–C (ΔEN 0)
Bond polarity scales with the electronegativity difference between the bonded atoms, because a larger difference means a more uneven electron distribution and a larger partial charge separation. C–C has identical atoms, so the sharing is perfectly equal and the bond is nonpolar. C–H is small enough that the AP course treats it as effectively nonpolar.